Agent Design & Orchestration

The problem

Most agent projects start with a framework and a demo, then stall when they meet a real process — approvals, exceptions, systems of record, and the steps a person quietly handles today.

The decisions that matter — how many agents, who can act versus only draft, where a human signs off, what happens on failure — end up made implicitly in code, where they are expensive to change.

What we build

• A written agent architecture: the agent graph, each agent's responsibilities, and the hand-offs between them.
• Task decomposition scoped to your actual processes, tools, and data.
• A risk model per step — read-only, draft-only, or act — with human-in-the-loop gates where they belong.
• Failure and escalation paths: retries, fallbacks, and the point where the agent stops and asks a person.
• An eval plan, so the design is testable from the first commit.

How it works

1. Workshop your target workflows and pick the use-cases worth automating.
2. Draft the agent graph and the guardrail model together.
3. Review it with your operators and your security owner.
4. Hand off the design as the spec the build follows.

What you get

• Agent architecture document and diagram.
• Prioritised use-case backlog with effort and risk notes.
• Eval plan and success metrics.